The Times: German War Planning
From Our Special Correspondent NUREMBERG, JULY 29
An
American military tribunal to-day acquitted the principal directors of
I.G. Farbenindustrie, Germany's vast chemical combine, on charges of
having planned and waged aggressive war, after a trial lasting for
nearly a year. Similar charges, it will be remarked, were rejected by
another court half-way through the Krupp case, in which judgment will be
pronounced on Saturday; and so by a double ruling the Gernan armnament
rihakers are absolved of criminal respon- sibitity in Hitler's war
plans. Thirteen of the Farben directors, including Carl Krauch and Georg
Von Schnitzler, the main defendants, were, however, found guiltY of war
crimes and crimes against humanity involving plunder in occupied
countries and the exploitation of slave labour, and sentence will be
passed on them to-morrow. Only one of tbem, Fritz Ter Meer, was
convicted under two of the five counts in the indictment, and of the 23
men on trial 10 were completely exonerated. Judging by the hand-waving
from the dock. many of the defendants' friends were in court, which, on
the entry of the tiibunal, observed a brief silence for the Ludwigshaven
disaster, which, by the irony of events, has coincided so grimly with
the Farben judgments. 50,000-WORD OPINION In considering the dual counts
of preparing aggressive war and having conspired to do so, the Court
based much of a 50,000-word opinion on the iudgment of the International
Military Tribunal, and was at pains to point out that 13 defendants in
the main Nuremberg trial had been acquitted under one or other of these
counts. One of its most significant rulings was that the Farben
organization as a corporation was not the subiect of prosecution. The
tribunal largely accepted the plea of the defence that the accused had
no knowledge of Hitler's designs which had been communi- cated to a
handful of political and military leaders at secret conferences. The
judgment declared: " While it is true that those with an insight into
the evil machinations of power politics might have suspected Hitler was
play- ing a cunning game of soothing restless Europe, the average
citizen of Germany, be he professional man, fartner, or industrialist,
could scarcdy be charged with knowledge that the rulers of the Reich
were planning to plunge Gernany into a war of aggression. . . . He was
the dictator. It was natural that the people of Germany listened to and
read his utterances in a belief that he spoke the truth." Quoting the
opinion of the international Tribunal that the war conspiracy must be
clearly outlined in -its criminal purpose and must not be too far
removed from the time of action and decision, the court found that
common knowledge of Hitler's plans did not exist in Germany. NO PROOF
German industry, the judgment continued, had becn threatened with
seizure unless it showed better cooperation with the four-year plan, and
the earlier financial support of Hitler by the industrialists arose
from the unemploy- ment and chaos of a world-wide depression. Nor had it
been proved that Farben (which held interests in about 500 firms
abroad) had through its foreign econonic policy helped to weaken
Germany's potential enemies or had carried on propaganda and espionage
activities for the Reich. The tribunal maintained that neither the
Moscow declaration of 1943 nor the London agreement on the prosecution
of major war criminals referred to criminal liability for waging
aggressive war. To depart from the concept that only major war
criminals, those responsible for the formulation and execution of
policies, were to be held liable could mean that the entire man-power of
Germany mnight at the uncontrolled discretion of the indicting
authorities be made to answer for waging war, thus leading to mass
punishments against which the International Tribunal had declared
itself. In the view of the court the defendants were neither high public
officials nor high military officers; their participation was that of
followers, and not leaders. GERMAN WAR PLANNING FARBEN DIRECTORS
ACQUIITED HITLER'S DESIGNS
|
|
||||
|
Sister Sites
Login
Associated Web Pages
|
Search
DISCLAIMER: This is not the website of Royal Dutch Shell Plc nor is it endorsed by them, or affiliated with them in any way. For the Shell portal site Shell.com Click here HIGH COURT PROCEEDINGS: Some articles/documents published on this website are the subject of High Court Injunction/Restraining Order/Contempt proceedings by EIGHT ROYAL DUTCH SHELL GROUP companies: For details click on the category “Dr John Huong” This Month
Month Archive
|
|||